More thoughts on brainstorming…
Saturday, August 4th, 2007 at 7:20 pmIn my last post I expressed my distaste for brainstorming which put some people on the defensive, particularly those like Patricia who make a living selling the concept of “collective intelligence”, but unfortunately I didn’t take the opportunity to form a supportive argument. So, it was this quote from Frans Johansson’s The Medici Effect which started the discussion, and I think it’s an interesting one. I wont get the chance to read the book until I can pick it up in The States or the UK, so I’m not sure how to respond to Patricia’s claim that he is actually in support of brainstorming. That would mean Marc Andreessen took a quote completely out of context distorting his ideas to support his opinion, which I’m pretty skeptical about. Either way, I’m willing to keep an open mind about it, but here are some of my problems with brainstorming:
First of all, I’ll agree that brainstorming isn’t usless. It’s just useless most of the time, which I’ll also agree has mostly to do with the fact that brainstorming sessions are often poorly administered. That still doesn’t mean that a well administered brainstorming session will out perform focused individuals tackling individual problems. It just means they wont be beaten as miserably. I think the one thing we can rely on well administered brainstorming creating is the “feeling” of having accomplished something when what is really created a great team building experience. You have given them an incentive to reinforce and feel good about the decisions the group makes. The power of people’s own influence over one another create a situation where the group can unconsciously sacrifices quality of ideas for a high group morale.
I’m not attacking collaboration, or teamwork and I definitely don’t believe that innovation happens in a bubble, because that is clearly not true. Modern human achievement owes much to our ability to exchange information and ideas quickly and easily. Jared Diamond explains the development of advanced Eurasian civilization in contrast to early American, and Australian aboriginal civilizations in no small part by their ability to travel, exchange, and communicate ideas easily across a geographic latitude.
Today, the internet and the flattening world that Thomas Friedman describes are making this exchange and communication possible at a level unresricted by gepgraphy. This is hugely exciting to me and I think we’re clearly benefiting from the innovation created by this increased ability to work together.
So what’s the bottom line? I’m not gonna say nobody should be using brainstorming. Maybe some people are really more creative working in a group. I definitely don’t think it is a reliable method for everyone. I think Patricia has plenty of work to do in getting teams to work better together, because there always the need for us to communicate and work better with each other in the work place. I just don’t think we need to be telling ourselves that brainstorming is going to be improving our ideas from their conception. That is the illusion.

August 6th, 2007 at 7:12 am
The topic of Brainstorming has definitely been on the forefront of blogs these past few weeks. I agree that many brainstorms are poorly administered. An even bigger problem might be the goal of the brainstorm. If the goal of the brainstorm is ONE GREAT IDEA then you will spend most of your time rejecting ideas that come up, and most people will leave feeling frustrated and only a few ideas have been generated.
If your goal is QUANTITY then all ideas are accepted even if they are bad. Nobody judges the ideas because they are just concerned about generating more ideas. Creativity multiplies. People get excited. I promise, QUANTITY leads to QUALITY whether you are brainstorming in a group or by yourself. ANALYSIS should always happen AFTER the storm, not during.
As long as you have the right goal–quantity– idea generation or brainstorming can achieve what you want–creativity and some quality ideas.
Check out http://www.brainreacitons.net if you are interested in brainstorming online.
August 6th, 2007 at 4:42 pm
You’re right - one of brainstorming’s hidden goals is team building. Unless you have excellent facilitation, your meeting is likely to be dominated by the most vocal and move at a pace that won’t necessarily work for all in the group. Solo brainstorming has the benefit of allowing people to move at their own comfortable pace. In a blog, if someone writes down an idea, then everyone else that visits the blog afterwards has the luxury of seeing everyone else’s thoughts and can build on them when they’re ready. This same process can be done in a group setting, it’s just not what people think of in a usual “brainstorming group”.
But before you give up on it completely, there are some things that
August 6th, 2007 at 10:52 pm
Hey, thanks for raising possibility that the citation from The Medici Effect was taken out of context. I understand the skepticism.
By all means read the quote in context for yourself.
This is what Johannsen says a couple of paragraphs away from the quote on pmarca: “So, should we all stop brainstorming? I don’t think so. Done right, brainstorming is a highly effective way to actively generate intersectional ideas.” Read it for yourself here: http://preview.tinyurl.com/2rnzn9
He then goes on to offer a couple of process suggestions to make it more effective,
Which is why I submit The Medici Effect supports brainstorming. I’d love to hear if you agree.
Now, those of us who make our living helping people make brainstorming and other group processes succeed have read the literature in depth, and there are numerous studies since 1987 that support the good results brainstorming can achieve, especially in complex situations. Is brainstorming perfect? Is it always the way to go? Of course not.
August 8th, 2007 at 11:11 am
brainstorming is best left to the individual. read up on “groupthink.” maybe you’ll love it.